- Mood:
Mesmerized - Listening to: Snap - Rhythm Is A Dancer (louder than is healthy)
- Reading: A BIG, FURRY DOG!
- Playing: Velvet Assassin
- Drinking: Toothpaste flavour saliva. Nyom.
So, liek, errrr. Wow.
Right now I'm listening to a podcast with some Aussies being rational, I'm a bit outraged to be honest. Not for any good reason of course, it's just that my prejudices demand that Australians be foolish and blonde, and so rationality from such a source is simply offensive.
(Actually, it's a pretty awesome listen.)
So, technically, my "listening to" info is A LIE! I have, however, been listening to some rather hideously voluminous dance music today, so it's also technically true, just... not up to the minute.
So. Anyway. Thing.
I wanna bitch and rant for a bit, for several reasons.
Firstly, AGH, writer's blockage, there are words that want to jump to paper, but they, for some reason, refuse to take the leap! Perhaps they fear the drop between my fingers and the keyboard, perhaps they are simply shy? I can't say I care either way, the fuckers are coming out, even if it means taking a literary enema and writing shit on this screen for half an hour or so.
Secondly, I made the stupid mistake of watching a serial idiot's resurrection video today, and I need (NEED) to vent (no really, I am bursting at the seams with vitriol, I'm in real, tangible pain (ok, mental pain, but it's still real and tangible) here.)
Thirdly, it's been over a year since I wrote a journal here... over two years since I wrote a journal that is actually about anything... I kind feel like I'm wasting my account here, and there's nothing worse than having a literary outlet available and wasted.
Fourth? CHEESE!
STORYTIME!
Once upon a time, there was an unpublished writer of medium talent (I hope I'm not thinking too highly of myself here... I'd bloody well better be of (at least) medium talent, otherwise, shit) who saw a youtube video. Ten videos to be exact, but together they made a gestalt entity of untold videoness, well, it was a fairly interesting multi-part video, which provided a fair degree of amusement and insight to the hopeful writer.
This video? It is merely background, it was aw'ite, it was certainly a good watch, but it doesn't play much of a big part in the most epic tale that is to come.
It seems important to note a long standing emnity between the guy involved in making this video, and the guy who made the video I'm about to bitch about... because the video I'm about the bitch about is about the video which is pretty decent, but not a big deal in the grand scheme of this story.
I hope you have noted it.
Have you?
You have?
Good.
Also, a thought I should've thinked a bit earlier - I will be calling the guy who made the pretty-decent-but-not-a-big-player video "Person A" and the guy who made the video about the video "Person B".
Now, person A makes his video, it is quite good, he's not great on camera, but you know what? Not a big deal as far as I can see - it's better to have an actual point than to be extremely articulate.
Here it begins to get interesting, person B decides he will make a video, in which he mocks person A for being slightly inarticulate, and not being led by overemotional nonsense over reason and relatively common sense.
--The Aussie podcasters are talking about organic food, it's quite interesting, also funny. Interesting AND funny. AT THE SAME TIME! I think I'm going to like these guys.--
Now, I don't care that person B is a narrow-minded git, that's fair enough, people are narrow minded and gittish, if you wanna mock people for inarticulate speeches and being slightly unprepared, yeah, well, we expect that. What gets me is that he does that thing that creationists do (yeah, he's a creationist... I like how close "creationism" is to "cretinism") and starts to witter on about how it's terribly, terribly arrogant to assume that we can claim things based on what we can observe, when in order to really understand things, we have to think outside the box.
I like thinking outside the box, it leads to interesting ideas, sometimes revolutionary ideas. It is, however, very rare that thinking outside the box lead to newer, deeper understandings of reality. This is especially true when the box we are asked to think outside of is the universe itself.
--Now they are talking about Polar bears ripping people's faces off... how cute ^^--
So yeah, this guy, person B, wants us to think outside the universe itself, you know, think outside of reality, OUTSIDE OF REALITY, in order to find the truth about "creation" UGH. AGH. RRRRGH!!
Personally, I don't care what he believes, he can believe whatever he wants - anyone is totally free to believe whatever they believe - but come on, telling people that in order to understand the universe, they have to ignore the entire universe? "Oh, but god is outside the universe!"
(Erm... how does that work? Physically outside? Is there an outside of the universe in any of the four tangible dimensions for him to be in? How then does he interect with humans inside the universe?
Is he totally absent in the tangible dimensions, and only present in other dimensions? How then does he interact with the tangible dimensions in order to interact with humans inside the universe?
Is he simply outside of time? How, the fuck, then does he do ANYTHING?
Hurrrrgh.)
No, no, I get it, god is beyond the universe that we can observe, we cannot know whether there is or is not some form of deity out there... and yet... person B KNOWS, he even has his phone number.
It just enrages me that someone can say "Oh how arrogant of you, that you refuse to make assumptions about things you cannot possibly know, and come to conclusions based on evidence and observation!" and then goes on to say "By the way? God exists, and loves me" and expect people to believe that they are humble. (You KNOW that god loves you, and we're the arrogant ones?)
I know the concept is a bit hard to grasp, but I know how my computer works because I am able to observe it working, if I could not observe its working, I would not be able to understand it, at least not as well as I can currently.
If you can observe a thing, you can come to understand the thing, if the thing is, by definition, inobservable, then it is, by definition, ununderstandabubbly difficult to understand.
The very idea that you can simply "think outside the box" and find the ultimate reality is ridiculous. I mean, ok, I'm sure that finding the ultimate reality will involve a great deal of thinking outside of boxes, but becoming certain that the reality we find is the ultimate one will most certainly involve a great deal of observing things that are actually observable.
Why is that so hard to understand?
Perhaps I will start talking to a wall and call it god?
Perhaps people will show more respect if I simply go mad, rather than be sensible.
There's a man living in my wall,
He loves me,
Oh he loves me.
There's a man living in my wall,
He made me,
Oh he made me.
There's a man watching me fall,
He pushed me,
Yeah he pushed me.
There's a man watching me fall,
I made the fucker up,
And he got a bit pissy about being a figment of my imagination and decided to smite me and send me to hell and then be generally cruel to me for all eternity because it seemed like a good idea to him at the time because that's what figments dooooooooo.
Yeah.
*banjo solo*
By Jim, Carl Sagan rocked. What a voice!
I feel better now.